Key points

  • The United States will terminate South Africa's and Rwanda's beneficiary status under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) from 1 January 2027, the Office of the US Trade Representative announced late on Monday.
  • President Donald Trump notified Congress and both governments of his intention to end their duty-free access after an annual eligibility review led by the Trade Representative's office.
  • Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said both governments were engaging in practices inconsistent with AGOA's eligibility criteria; Washington listed trade barriers, corruption and national-security concerns for South Africa, and a longer list including rule-of-law and human-rights concerns for Rwanda.
  • South Africa is the programme's largest beneficiary, exporting about $1.7bn of goods to the US under AGOA in 2025; removal is not a trade ban, but its goods will face America's standard tariffs instead of entering duty-free.
  • Pretoria says it was prepared for the decision and remains open to dialogue, and its trade minister says South Africa has 60 days to address Washington's concerns before any suspension takes effect.

The United States has cut two African countries out of its flagship trade preference scheme. Late on Monday, the Office of the US Trade Representative confirmed that President Donald Trump had notified Congress and the governments of South Africa and Rwanda of his intention to terminate their beneficiary status under the African Growth and Opportunity Act, effective 1 January 2027. The decision followed the programme's annual interagency eligibility review, led by the Trade Representative's office. Read more: German retail sales fall 2.0% in September, missing forecasts of a rise

AGOA, enacted by Congress in 2000, gives eligible sub-Saharan African countries duty-free access to the American market for more than 1,800 products. Eligibility is reviewed every year against criteria covering market-based economies, the rule of law, political pluralism and the removal of barriers to US trade and investment. Losing it does not close the American market — it removes the preference, so exports that entered duty-free instead face the standard tariff schedule.

Why South Africa was cut

For South Africa, Washington said it was deeply concerned about barriers to US trade and investment, corruption, and threats to US national security and foreign-policy interests. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer put it in the review's language: "President Trump found that the governments of Rwanda and South Africa are engaging in practices that are inconsistent with AGOA's eligibility criteria."

The decision lands after a long deterioration in the relationship. The Trump administration has repeatedly attacked South Africa over what the president says is the persecution of white South Africans — a claim Pretoria rejects as a falsehood spread by fringe groups, according to Al Jazeera. Washington has also taken issue with South Africa's foreign policy, in particular the genocide case it brought against Israel at the International Court of Justice, which Israel denies.

The harbour of Durban, South Africa, with cranes and container ships
The harbour of Durban, South Africa's busiest port, which handles the bulk of the country's container traffic. Durban's container terminal handled more than 700,000 twenty-foot equivalent units in the 2025/26 financial year, according to its operator. Photo: PhilippN / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0). Source file · Licence

South Africa's government had been bracing for the outcome. Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau told reporters on Friday that the country was ready for whatever decision Washington reached, and that the United States would remain a valued partner. His department said last week it was prepared for a negative outcome and remained open to dialogue. It also put the exposure in proportion: exports under AGOA make up only about 10 percent of South Africa's total exports to the United States, and 1 percent of its total global exports. President Cyril Ramaphosa has said the country must prepare for being cut out of the programme and is already seeking new markets, including through new trade deals with partners such as China.

Why Rwanda was cut

For Rwanda, Washington's list of concerns was longer: trade and investment barriers, the rule of law, political pluralism, internationally recognised workers' rights, human rights, and threats to US national security and foreign-policy interests. Tensions between Rwanda and the United States have deteriorated over Kigali's involvement in the conflict in neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo, according to Moneyweb's account of the announcement.

Rwanda has been here before: it was also suspended from the programme in 2018, Al Jazeera noted. Its main exports to the United States are coffee, tea and minerals — smaller in value than South Africa's, but central to the livelihoods of the farmers and miners who produce them.

Key figures
MeasureFigureSource
South African exports to the US under AGOA, 2025About $1.7bnAl Jazeera
South Africa's share of all AGOA-related exports to the US54%BusinessTech
Products covered by AGOA duty-free accessMore than 1,800US Trade Representative, via Moneyweb
AGOA share of South Africa's exports to the US / global exportsAbout 10% / 1%South African Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, via Al Jazeera
Added tariff from losing AGOA, on top of existing 12.5% tariffs3.4%Presidential envoy Wandile Sihlobo, via BusinessTech
Estimated welfare loss for South Africa from exclusion$20.8mNational Agricultural Marketing Council, via NovaNews
Estimated output cut, vegetables, fruits and nuts sector1.3%National Agricultural Marketing Council, via NovaNews

South Africa's main exports to the United States overall are precious stones and metals, motor vehicles, iron and steel, according to Al Jazeera. Under AGOA specifically, the leading lines are motor vehicles and parts, farm products and wine — which is why the decision reaches from car plants to citrus farms. The National Agricultural Marketing Council estimates the exclusion could reduce South Africa's welfare by $20.8 million and cut output in the vegetables, fruits and nuts sector by 1.3 percent, according to NovaNews.

Coffee beans drying on raised racks at Maraba, Rwanda
Coffee beans drying on raised racks at Maraba, Rwanda. Coffee is one of Rwanda's main exports to the United States, alongside tea and minerals, and will lose its duty-free access from 1 January 2027. Photo: Amakuru / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0). Source file · Licence

For exporters, the arithmetic is concrete. Presidential envoy on agriculture Wandile Sihlobo said the loss of AGOA would add a 3.4 percent tariff onto the 12.5 percent tariffs the United States already has in effect against South Africa, according to BusinessTech. That is a cost borne first by American buyers and South African sellers, and it lands on goods that compete on thin margins — fruit, wine and car parts among them.

What happens next

The calendar now matters more than the announcement. Minister Tau said South Africa will have 60 days to address the concerns raised by the United States before any suspension, full or partial, could take effect — a window that runs alongside the 1 January termination date and leaves room, in principle, for a negotiated reprieve. Neither country had issued an immediate response to the announcement itself at the time Al Jazeera published, though Pretoria's pre-announcement statements had already set its line: prepared, and open to dialogue.

The programme itself continues for its remaining beneficiaries: after expiring in September 2025, it was retroactively extended to December 2026 and then extended to the end of 2028, according to BusinessTech. For South Africa and Rwanda, the question is whether the 60-day window produces a deal that restores their standing — or whether January brings a new tariff bill for the cars, citrus and coffee that once entered America duty-free.

Updates & corrections

Published 3 November 2026.

No updates or corrections have been made to this article since publication.

Sources

If you spot an error, see our Corrections Policy.